Existing-Building Commissioning
EBCx goes beyond fast payback of energy audit and quick fixes of tune-up to provide ongoing savings
Page 2 of 2
The first sign that a client is requesting an energy audit in EBCx clothing is that the deliverables do not include the CFR. This indicates the client is seeking short-term cost savings, rather than long-term strategic operational improvements. The EBCx process not only identifies ways to spend less; it provides a foundation for ensuring a building's goals are met in the future.
GOING BEYOND THE TUNE-UP
An energy audit can be improved considerably with the addition of a building, or maintenance, “tune-up.”
“A maintenance tune-up is a systematic process … which includes a conditions assessment and the implementation of maintenance measures that have not been completed during the regular preventive-maintenance schedule,” the California Commissioning Collaborative (CCC) explains.
Although a tune-up can be of tremendous benefit to a building, it lacks strategic planning. No attention is paid to altering the operation of the building. A preventive-maintenance contractor is to maintain the building in the “as-found” condition. To take the next step and qualify as EBCx, a tune-up must consider the bigger picture of a building's mission into the future.
“Retrocommissioning includes tune-up procedures, but it also … look(s) at operational issues, using a systems approach,” the CCC says.
An important part of EBCx is the immediate repair/correction of minor operation-and-maintenance (O&M) problems as instrumented data are gathered. While, for example, an ASHRAE Level II audit might include analysis of a boiler-blowdown heat-recovery improvement based on assumed heat losses when a steam-condensate meter is broken, EBCx would include repair of the meter, with further analysis based on actual heat loss. That translates into O&M savings as well as energy savings. Often, such a repair pays for itself before the EBCx process is finished.
TRAINING, DOCUMENTATION, MONITORING
The lack of persistence of energy savings always has been the Achilles' heel of the audit process, even when combined with a tune-up. After fast-payback energy-conservation items are installed, immediate O&M issues attended to, and long-term energy-saving items analyzed and placed into the client's capital-expenditure plan, everyone walks away with a sense of achievement. But when controls, shafts, and linkages go out of adjustment, lose programming, or just plain fail, the overworked O&M staff has to abandon good energy practices to avoid getting fired because of occupant complaints. It is not enough merely to improve a facility; the O&M staff has to be trained and left with documentation to diagnose and fix breakdowns quickly and keep the building in “continuous-commissioning” order.
Just as a building's original design usually does not reflect its current mission, original design documents often do not include what needs to be done to maintain a building. The placement of small, inconspicuous labels on ceiling tiles in conjunction with simple one-line diagrams, for example, allows O&M workers to track a complaint to a box and replace an actuator before lunch on his or her first day on the job.
Another aspect of the EBCx process not included in the audit or the tune-up is the use of trend logging, real-time energy analysis, and/or automated fault diagnosis for fast correction of energy-wasting failures. During the last phases of the EBCx process, after immediate corrections have been made and fast-payback energy-conservation measures implemented, a commissioning authority should implement data-acquisition trend logs that allow a picture of building operation at a glance.
CONCLUSION
In addition to offering the fast payback of the energy audit and the quick fixes of the building tune-up, EBCx allows building equipment to look after itself and provide savings for years to come.
REFERENCES
-
Harrell, S. (2008, November). Continuous commissioning. HPAC Engineering, pp. 20, 22, 23, 25.
-
Continuous commissioning. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://esl.eslwin.tamu.edu/continuous-commissioning-.html
-
BCA. (2008). Best practices in commissioning existing buildings. Retrieved from http://www.bcxa.org/downloads/bca-ebcx-best-practices.pdf
-
Haasl, T., & Sharp, T. (1999). A practical guide for commissioning existing buildings. Retrieved from http://eber.ed.ornl.gov/commercialproducts/RetroCommissioningGuide-w-cover.pdf
-
CCC. (2006). California commissioning guide: Existing buildings. Retrieved from http://www.documents.dgs.ca.gov/green/commissionguideexisting.pdf
For past HPAC Engineering feature articles, visit www.hpac.com.
A commissioning project manager for AKF Group LLC and a longtime member of HPAC Engineering's Editorial Advisory Board, Ron Wilkinson, PE, LEED AP, is the author of the first commissioning training program for the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design for New Construction and Major Renovations Green Building Rating System; the chair of the commissioning advisory committee of The American Institute of Architects (AIA) Committee on the Environment; the recording secretary for American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Guideline Project Committee 0.2/1.2, The Commissioning Process for Existing Building Systems and Assemblies/The Commissioning Process for Existing HVAC&R Systems; and a member of the Building Commissioning Association. An ASHRAE Distinguished Lecturer and an AIA Continuing Education Lecturer, he has spoken on commissioning practices internationally.
Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2012 Penton Media Inc.
Acceptable Use Policy blog comments powered by Disqus








Recent Comments